Skip to main content

PCB solder terminals: investigating copper dissolution and solder-bath analysis

PCB solder terminals: investigating copper dissolution and solder-bath analysis

At a glance

Investigate suspected copper loss in PCB solder terminals using matched geometry evidence, solder contact history and bath-composition records, without assuming a universal erosion rate.

When a PCB solder terminal appears thinner after soldering, establish whether copper base metal was actually lost before diagnosing dissolution. Molten tin-bearing solder can dissolve copper, but appearance may also change with plating, solder coverage or viewing position. Retain unsoldered same-batch controls and correlate geometry evidence with cumulative solder contact and bath-analysis records.

Copper need not melt for dissolution to occur

Kester's technical guidance discusses copper entering molten solder from boards and components and the effect of copper in the alloy on further dissolution. An ACE selective-soldering paper hosted by IPC also discusses copper erosion in relation to alloy, contact time and flow conditions. These support the mechanism, not a universal terminal erosion rate.

The paper's numerical results belong to its particular boards, alloys and equipment. This article adopts no general contact-time limit, rework count, bath temperature or composition threshold. Local loss in PCB barrel copper must not be used directly to predict dimensional loss in a different solid terminal pin.

Compare the same location and material

Identify abnormal pieces and unsoldered same-batch controls, with axial position, section direction and original geometry. In a microsection, distinguish copper base metal, plating, solder and interface regions. A smaller apparent outside diameter or colour change alone does not establish copper dissolution.

Where needed, use a laboratory with an appropriate preparation and analysis method. Preserve scale, preparation records and images. Removing solder or plating can itself alter a surface; do not attribute the entire dimensional change after an unvalidated removal process to soldering. Avoid repeatedly reheating a failure specimen before investigating its original condition.

RecordUnits or contentPurpose
Terminal and controlPart number, material, finish and batchAvoid unlike starting geometries
Local geometrymm or μm, location and methodEstablish base-metal loss
Contact historys, initial soldering and each rework separatelyRetain cumulative exposure
Process stateAlloy, temperature °C, nozzle and flow settingsDefine comparable conditions
Bath analysisSampling time, location, batch and concentration unitsLink results to the solder actually used

A supply certificate is not an in-use bath analysis

An original solder certificate describes the delivered material. An operating bath needs sampling records under the applicable process requirements. Link the affected production time to bath sampling, additions and maintenance. An analysis without sampling time or location may not represent the process that produced the part.

Check concentration units: by mass-fraction definition, 1 wt%=10000 ppm, so 0.50 wt%=5000 ppm. This is only a conversion, not a recommended copper concentration or alarm limit. Obtain limits and sampling frequency from the actual alloy supplier, equipment process and approved requirements. Do not improvise elemental additions to correct a bath.

Validate more than appearance

For PCB solder terminals, combine before/after material and dimensional evidence, actual thermal history, contact time and post-process criteria in a controlled investigation. If local base-metal loss is confirmed, review remaining geometry and connection condition against functional risk. Do not reduce allowable current in direct proportion to a dimensional loss.

Terminal solderability tests address wetting and related questions; they do not alone prove that prolonged solder contact preserved base dimensions. Complete the applicable dimensional, soldering and functional checks after process changes.

Questions

Does a low-copper-dissolution alloy remove the need for validation? No. Check its conditions and validate the actual terminal and PCB construction.

Is the bath setpoint enough evidence? Retain relevant measured-temperature evidence, contact history, alloy and flow information as well.

Sources

Kester guidance on lead-free alloys and copper dissolution; IPC-hosted ACE paper on selective soldering and copper erosion.

The AI cover illustrates the copper/solder interface; it is not a Hongchuan terminal section or failure record. No dissolution rate, bath limit, rework allowance or current rating is specified.

Apply this to your component selection

Start with the product catalog and model guide. For a specific project, send the part number or drawing, quantity and key operating conditions. This article will be included in your enquiry for context.

Articles explain selection considerations and do not replace the confirmed drawing, test conditions or supply documents for a specific part. Check any cited source and its applicable edition for standards and parameters.