Skip to main content

Testing PCB Terminal Solderability: Dip, Reflow and Wetting-Balance Methods

Testing PCB Terminal Solderability: Dip, Reflow and Wetting-Balance Methods

At a glance

Choose a solderability method for leaded or surface-mount terminals, distinguish comparative wetting data from acceptance limits, and specify reproducible test conditions.

Direct answer Match the solderability test to terminal construction and the assembly process before setting acceptance criteria. Solder coverage, force-versus-time behaviour and resistance to soldering heat answer different questions. A wetting curve alone does not establish lot acceptance or qualify a complete board assembly.

Select a method before sending samples

Object or purposeOfficial method to consultClarify in the report
Leaded devices or leadsIEC 60068-2-20Solderability versus resistance-to-heat test
Surface-mount terminalsIEC 60068-2-58Suitability of dip or reflow evaluation
Comparing termination wettingIEC 60068-2-69Solder-bath or globule wetting-balance conditions
SMD wetting with solder pasteIEC 60068-2-83Paste system and comparative procedure

The public descriptions of IEC 60068-2-69 and IEC 60068-2-83 caution against using their data as absolute quantitative pass/fail values. If purchasing documents require a wetting-time or force criterion, agree the method, specimen scope and justification with the laboratory and supplier. No universal time or force threshold is proposed here.

Make reports comparable

A practical test request should identify the part and drawing revision, coating stack, production lot and storage history. State the complete standard edition, test clause, preconditioning temperature, humidity and duration. Record solder alloy and flux identity, temperature in °C, time in s, immersion depth in mm, speed in mm/s, specimen orientation and the tested surface.

Request raw curves, photographs, sample count and instrument calibration status. For wetting force, retain the unit and say whether any perimeter normalization was applied. A larger terminal may differ in geometry and thermal mass even if its surface condition resembles a smaller one. Compare lots of the same part under controlled conditions; label every deliberate change.

Bring the evidence back to production

When nominally identical lots differ, first confirm specimen identity and test conditions. Then review coating, contamination, packaging and storage records. After a controlled retest, use the intended PCB, solder and equipment for a pilot assembly evaluation. Keep incoming solderability, process-window results and subsequent connection reliability in separate records so that a corrective action has a clear target.

Common questions

Does passing resistance to soldering heat prove solderability? No. Surviving thermal exposure and forming a satisfactory soldered interface are different test objectives.

Is “test to IEC” enough? Specify the number, edition, method and agreed acceptance criteria. IEC 60068-2-69 also has a 2019 amendment; the contract should identify the edition being applied.

Related products and reading

Explore related products · Reading an XRF coating-thickness report · Send drawings and application conditions

Sources

Sources checked on 6 October 2026. Worked examples explain methods, not HC-SP product ratings or test results. Cover is an AI-generated engineering illustration, not an actual product photograph.

Apply this to your component selection

Start with the product catalog and model guide. For a specific project, send the part number or drawing, quantity and key operating conditions. This article will be included in your enquiry for context.

Articles explain selection considerations and do not replace the confirmed drawing, test conditions or supply documents for a specific part. Check any cited source and its applicable edition for standards and parameters.