Skip to main content

SMD Busbar X-ray Void Percentage: Define the ROI and Projected Area

SMD Busbar X-ray Void Percentage: Define the ROI and Projected Area

At a glance

Make SMD busbar void reports reproducible by defining the inspection region, segmentation and projected area. A 2D void percentage is not automatically a 3D volume fraction.

For an SMD busbar X-ray void report, agree the region of interest (ROI), segmentation and reported quantity first. If the agreed metric is a 2D projected-area fraction, calculate identified void area within the ROI divided by agreed ROI area, times 100%. This is not automatically the three-dimensional void volume fraction.

Make the percentage reproducible

Nordson's X-ray application overview lists void percentage, area and solder-layer separation as distinct inspection outputs. Specify which output is required. This article proposes reporting practices, not a universal void limit for all SMD copper busbars.

A denominator example

Hypothetically, 20 mm² of identified projected void area divided by a 200 mm² ROI gives 10%. Using 250 mm² as the denominator gives 8%, without changing the joint. Define whether the ROI follows a nominal land, actual solder projection or another agreed region before comparing suppliers.

RecordIncludePurpose
Original imageSample identity, view and acquisition settingsAvoid judging only cropped images
ROIOverlay, area in mm² and definitionFix the denominator
SegmentationThreshold, filtering and manual changesExplain included pixels
ResultTotal area, largest projection and locationRetain local concentration information
Measurement conditionsPixel size, calibration and software versionSupport repeatable review

Do not double-count overlapping projections

For a defined 2D metric, use the union of segmented projected regions in the selected image. Overlapping projected locations must not be added twice. Keep different views and separated layers as identified results; summing their areas indiscriminately changes the metric.

Agree segmentation using the same original images and retain overlays. Lowering a reported percentage through threshold adjustment is not process improvement. Evaluate whether noisy, saturated or heavily obscured images are suitable for the task.

Depth and volume need a different assessment

ZEISS's technical note on laminography and 3D X-ray microscopy discusses reconstruction, missing angular information and artifacts. If depth, layer assignment or volume fraction matters, agree the appropriate reconstruction, resolving capability and segmentation basis with the inspection provider. A “2.5D” label or voxel size alone is not proof of accurate volume measurement.

Write the inspection boundary into procurement documents

Provide solder geometry, copper thickness and PCB construction in an SMD busbar enquiry. Define whether the concern is overall fraction, local clustering or a critical current path. Agree limits from contractual requirements and assembly validation rather than borrowing BGA limits. See busbar void and wetting troubleshooting for process investigation.

FAQ

Does a low projected void percentage guarantee acceptable temperature rise? No. Validate the actual electrical and thermal assembly.

Are two 10% reports directly comparable? Only after checking compatible ROI definitions, imaging and algorithms.

AI-generated void-analysis concept, not a real radiograph or Hongchuan test result. Areas are hypothetical calculations; no universal acceptance percentage is asserted.

Apply this to your component selection

Start with the product catalog and model guide. For a specific project, send the part number or drawing, quantity and key operating conditions. This article will be included in your enquiry for context.

Articles explain selection considerations and do not replace the confirmed drawing, test conditions or supply documents for a specific part. Check any cited source and its applicable edition for standards and parameters.